linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 15/19] bfq-iosched: Revert "bfq: Fix computation of shallow depth"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210208175858.2092008-15-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon,  8 Feb 2021 12:58:54 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Lin Feng <linf@...gsu.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 15/19] bfq-iosched: Revert "bfq: Fix computation of shallow depth"

From: Lin Feng <linf@...gsu.com>

[ Upstream commit 388c705b95f23f317fa43e6abf9ff07b583b721a ]

This reverts commit 6d4d273588378c65915acaf7b2ee74e9dd9c130a.

bfq.limit_depth passes word_depths[] as shallow_depth down to sbitmap core
sbitmap_get_shallow, which uses just the number to limit the scan depth of
each bitmap word, formula:
scan_percentage_for_each_word = shallow_depth / (1 << sbimap->shift) * 100%

That means the comments's percentiles 50%, 75%, 18%, 37% of bfq are correct.
But after commit patch 'bfq: Fix computation of shallow depth', we use
sbitmap.depth instead, as a example in following case:

sbitmap.depth = 256, map_nr = 4, shift = 6; sbitmap_word.depth = 64.
The resulsts of computed bfqd->word_depths[] are {128, 192, 48, 96}, and
three of the numbers exceed core dirver's 'sbitmap_word.depth=64' limit
nothing.

Signed-off-by: Lin Feng <linf@...gsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 7d19aae015aeb..ba32adaeefdd0 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -6320,13 +6320,13 @@ static unsigned int bfq_update_depths(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
 	 * limit 'something'.
 	 */
 	/* no more than 50% of tags for async I/O */
-	bfqd->word_depths[0][0] = max(bt->sb.depth >> 1, 1U);
+	bfqd->word_depths[0][0] = max((1U << bt->sb.shift) >> 1, 1U);
 	/*
 	 * no more than 75% of tags for sync writes (25% extra tags
 	 * w.r.t. async I/O, to prevent async I/O from starving sync
 	 * writes)
 	 */
-	bfqd->word_depths[0][1] = max((bt->sb.depth * 3) >> 2, 1U);
+	bfqd->word_depths[0][1] = max(((1U << bt->sb.shift) * 3) >> 2, 1U);
 
 	/*
 	 * In-word depths in case some bfq_queue is being weight-
@@ -6336,9 +6336,9 @@ static unsigned int bfq_update_depths(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
 	 * shortage.
 	 */
 	/* no more than ~18% of tags for async I/O */
-	bfqd->word_depths[1][0] = max((bt->sb.depth * 3) >> 4, 1U);
+	bfqd->word_depths[1][0] = max(((1U << bt->sb.shift) * 3) >> 4, 1U);
 	/* no more than ~37% of tags for sync writes (~20% extra tags) */
-	bfqd->word_depths[1][1] = max((bt->sb.depth * 6) >> 4, 1U);
+	bfqd->word_depths[1][1] = max(((1U << bt->sb.shift) * 6) >> 4, 1U);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
 		for (j = 0; j < 2; j++)
-- 
2.27.0