[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210208181615.381861-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 19:16:14 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] vt_ioctl: Remove in_interrupt() check
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>
reset_vc() uses a "!in_interrupt()" conditional before resetting the
palettes, which is a blocking operation. Since commit
8b6312f4dcc1e ("[PATCH] vt: refactor console SAK processing")
all calls are invoked from a workqueue process context, with the
blocking console lock always acquired.
Remove the "!in_interrupt()" check.
Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darwish@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c b/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
index 4a4cbd4a5f37a..89aeaf3c1bca6 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
@@ -930,8 +930,7 @@ void reset_vc(struct vc_data *vc)
put_pid(vc->vt_pid);
vc->vt_pid = NULL;
vc->vt_newvt = -1;
- if (!in_interrupt()) /* Via keyboard.c:SAK() - akpm */
- reset_palette(vc);
+ reset_palette(vc);
}
void vc_SAK(struct work_struct *work)
--
2.30.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists