linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 15/15] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add pcim_iomap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210208193516.GA406304@bjorn-Precision-5520>
Date:   Mon, 8 Feb 2021 13:35:16 -0600
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Gustavo Pimentel <Gustavo.Pimentel@...opsys.com>
Cc:     linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/15] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add pcim_iomap_table return
 checker

[+cc Krzysztof]

>From reading the subject, I thought you were adding a function to
check the return values, i.e., a "checker."  But you're really adding
"checks" :)

On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 10:58:06PM +0100, Gustavo Pimentel wrote:
> Detected by CoverityScan CID 16555 ("Dereference null return")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
> index 686b4ff..7445033 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
> @@ -238,6 +238,9 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  	dw->rd_ch_cnt = vsec_data.rd_ch_cnt;
>  
>  	dw->rg_region.vaddr = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[vsec_data.rg.bar];
> +	if (!dw->rg_region.vaddr)
> +		return -ENOMEM;

This doesn't seem quite right.  If pcim_iomap_table() fails, it
returns NULL.  But then we assign "vaddr = NULL[vsec_data.rg.bar]"
which dereferences the NULL pointer even before your test.

This "pcim_iomap_table(dev)[n]" pattern is extremely common.  There
are over 100 calls of pcim_iomap_table(), and

  $ git grep "pcim_iomap_table(.*)\[.*\]" | wc -l

says about 75 of them are of this form, where we dereference the
result before testing it.

>  	dw->rg_region.vaddr += vsec_data.rg.off;
>  	dw->rg_region.paddr = pdev->resource[vsec_data.rg.bar].start;
>  	dw->rg_region.paddr += vsec_data.rg.off;
> @@ -250,12 +253,18 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  		struct dw_edma_block *dt_block = &vsec_data.dt_wr[i];
>  
>  		ll_region->vaddr = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[ll_block->bar];
> +		if (!ll_region->vaddr)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +
>  		ll_region->vaddr += ll_block->off;
>  		ll_region->paddr = pdev->resource[ll_block->bar].start;
>  		ll_region->paddr += ll_block->off;
>  		ll_region->sz = ll_block->sz;
>  
>  		dt_region->vaddr = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[dt_block->bar];
> +		if (!dt_region->vaddr)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +
>  		dt_region->vaddr += dt_block->off;
>  		dt_region->paddr = pdev->resource[dt_block->bar].start;
>  		dt_region->paddr += dt_block->off;
> @@ -269,12 +278,18 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  		struct dw_edma_block *dt_block = &vsec_data.dt_rd[i];
>  
>  		ll_region->vaddr = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[ll_block->bar];
> +		if (!ll_region->vaddr)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +
>  		ll_region->vaddr += ll_block->off;
>  		ll_region->paddr = pdev->resource[ll_block->bar].start;
>  		ll_region->paddr += ll_block->off;
>  		ll_region->sz = ll_block->sz;
>  
>  		dt_region->vaddr = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[dt_block->bar];
> +		if (!dt_region->vaddr)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +
>  		dt_region->vaddr += dt_block->off;
>  		dt_region->paddr = pdev->resource[dt_block->bar].start;
>  		dt_region->paddr += dt_block->off;
> -- 
> 2.7.4
>