[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YCGSwZnSXIz5Ssef@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 20:36:33 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Vyacheslav Mitrofanov
<Vyacheslav.Mitrofanov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] net: stmmac: Add DW MAC GPIOs and Baikal-T1 GMAC
support
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 05:08:04PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
Hi Serge
I suggest you split this patchset up. This uses the generic GPIO
framework, which is great. But that also means you should be Cc: the
GPIO subsystem maintainers and list. But you don't want to spam them
with all the preparation work, which has little to do with the GPIO
code.
So please split the actual GPIO driver and DT binding patches from the
rest. netdev can review the preparation work, with a comment in the
0/X patch about what the big picture is, and then afterwards review
the GPIO patchset with a wider audience.
And as Jakub pointed out, nobody is going to review 60 patches all at
once. Please submit one series at a time, get it merged, and then
move onto the next.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists