[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f5a24814-4e94-3e40-db0a-463b469283d2@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 12:11:32 -0800
From: "Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 06/25] x86/cet: Add control-protection fault handler
On 2/8/2021 11:48 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 11:23:18AM -0800, Yu, Yu-cheng wrote:
>> exc_general_protection() and do_trap() both call show_signal(), which
>> then calls printk_ratelimit().
>
> You could've done some git archeology and could've found
>
> abd4f7505baf ("x86: i386-show-unhandled-signals-v3")
>
> which explains why that ratelimiting is needed.
>
>> For example, if a shell script, in a loop re-starts an app when it
>> exits, and the app is causing control-protection fault. The log
>> messages should be rate limited.
>
> I think you should be able to get where I'm going with this, by now:
> please put a comment over the ratelimiting to explain why it is there,
> just like the above commit explains.
I will add that.
>
> Thx.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists