[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210208204641.GE2077938@xps15>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 13:46:41 -0700
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Daniel Kiss <Daniel.Kiss@....com>,
Denis Nikitin <denik@...omium.org>,
Al Grant <al.grant@....com>, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] perf cs-etm: Fix bitmap for option
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 11:08:29PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
>
> When set option with macros ETM_OPT_CTXTID and ETM_OPT_TS, it wrongly
> takes these two values (14 and 28 prespectively) as bit masks, but
> actually both are the offset for bits. But this doesn't lead to
> further failure due to the AND logic operation will be always true for
> ETM_OPT_CTXTID / ETM_OPT_TS.
>
> This patch defines new independent macros (rather than using the
> "config" bits) for requesting the "contextid" and "timestamp" for
> cs_etm_set_option().
>
> [leoy: Extract the change as a separate patch for easier review]
This should go just above your name - see below.
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
[Extract the change as a separate patch for easier review]
Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
> index bd446aba64f7..c25c878fd06c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
> @@ -156,6 +156,10 @@ static int cs_etm_set_timestamp(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> return err;
> }
>
> +#define ETM_SET_OPT_CTXTID (1 << 0)
> +#define ETM_SET_OPT_TS (1 << 1)
> +#define ETM_SET_OPT_MASK (ETM_SET_OPT_CTXTID | ETM_SET_OPT_TS)
> +
I would much rather see this fixed with the BIT() macro as it is done in the
rest of this set than defining new constant.
With the above:
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
I have picked up the kernel portion of this set. I suggest you fix the above
and send another revision to Arnaldo with my RBs.
> static int cs_etm_set_option(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> struct evsel *evsel, u32 option)
> {
> @@ -169,17 +173,17 @@ static int cs_etm_set_option(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> !cpu_map__has(online_cpus, i))
> continue;
>
> - if (option & ETM_OPT_CTXTID) {
> + if (option & ETM_SET_OPT_CTXTID) {
> err = cs_etm_set_context_id(itr, evsel, i);
> if (err)
> goto out;
> }
> - if (option & ETM_OPT_TS) {
> + if (option & ETM_SET_OPT_TS) {
> err = cs_etm_set_timestamp(itr, evsel, i);
> if (err)
> goto out;
> }
> - if (option & ~(ETM_OPT_CTXTID | ETM_OPT_TS))
> + if (option & ~(ETM_SET_OPT_MASK))
> /* Nothing else is currently supported */
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -406,7 +410,7 @@ static int cs_etm_recording_options(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> evsel__set_sample_bit(cs_etm_evsel, CPU);
>
> err = cs_etm_set_option(itr, cs_etm_evsel,
> - ETM_OPT_CTXTID | ETM_OPT_TS);
> + ETM_SET_OPT_CTXTID | ETM_SET_OPT_TS);
> if (err)
> goto out;
> }
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists