[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLV2Sikxnr3-k94nqcF5vz+jsekhhUrmXEKkwzwwu4up8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 12:50:49 -0800
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Liam Mark <lmark@...eaurora.org>,
Chris Goldsworthy <cgoldswo@...eaurora.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...nel.org>,
Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>,
Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@...gle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Sandeep Patil <sspatil@...gle.com>,
Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@...gle.com>,
Ørjan Eide <orjan.eide@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>,
Simon Ser <contact@...rsion.fr>,
James Jones <jajones@...dia.com>,
linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] dma-buf: heaps: Fix the name used when exporting
dmabufs to be the actual heap name
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 2:08 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 05:47:48AM +0000, John Stultz wrote:
> > By default dma_buf_export() sets the exporter name to be
> > KBUILD_MODNAME. Unfortunately this may not be identical to the
> > string used as the heap name (ie: "system" vs "system_heap").
> >
> > This can cause some minor confusion with tooling, and there is
> > the future potential where multiple heap types may be exported
> > by the same module (but would all have the same name).
> >
> > So to avoid all this, set the exporter exp_name to the heap name.
> >
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
> > Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Liam Mark <lmark@...eaurora.org>
> > Cc: Chris Goldsworthy <cgoldswo@...eaurora.org>
> > Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>
> > Cc: Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Sandeep Patil <sspatil@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Ørjan Eide <orjan.eide@....com>
> > Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> > Cc: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>
> > Cc: Simon Ser <contact@...rsion.fr>
> > Cc: James Jones <jajones@...dia.com>
> > Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> > Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
>
> Looks reasonable to me.
>
> I guess the main worry is "does this mean heap names become uapi", in
> which case I'm maybe not so sure anymore how this will tie into the
> overall gpu memory accounting story.
>
> Since for dma-buf heaps one name per buffer is perfectly fine, since
> dma-buf heaps aren't very dynamic. But on discrete gpu drivers buffers
> move, so baking in the assumption that "exporter name = resource usage for
> this buffer" is broken.
I suspect I'm missing a subtlety in what you're describing. My sense
of the exporter name doesn't account for a buffer's usage, it just
describes what code allocated it and implicitly which dmabuf_ops
handles it. Maybe could you give a more specific example of what
you're hoping to avoid?
To me this patch is mostly just a consistency/least-surprise thing, so
the heaps exporter name matches the string used for the heap's chardev
device (the interface used to allocate it) in output like
debugfs/dma_buf/bufinfo.
thanks
-john
Powered by blists - more mailing lists