linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: do not assume PTE is writable after follow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210208232625.GA4718@ziepe.ca>
Date:   Mon, 8 Feb 2021 19:26:25 -0400
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc:     dan.j.williams@...el.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: do not assume PTE is writable after follow_pfn

On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 05:02:59PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 02:51:33PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 01:14:11PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> > 
> > > But I do have a question on why dax as the only user needs to pass in the
> > > notifier to follow_pte() for initialization.
> > 
> > Not sure either, why does DAX opencode something very much like
> > page_mkclean() with dax_entry_mkclean()?
> > 
> > Also it looks like DAX uses the wrong notifier, it calls
> > MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR but page_mkclean_one() uses
> > MMU_NOTIFY_PROTECTION_PAGE for the same PTE modification sequence??
> > 
> > page_mkclean() has some technique to make the notifier have the right
> > size without becoming entangled in the PTL locks..
> 
> Right.  I guess it's because dax doesn't have "struct page*" on the
> back, so it

It doesn't? I thought DAX cases did?

Jason