linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net] net: bridge: use switchdev for port flags set through sysfs too

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <161282821288.13069.16334035236215483610.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 08 Feb 2021 23:50:12 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc:     kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, andrew@...n.ch,
        vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, roopa@...dia.com,
        nikolay@...dia.com, jiri@...nulli.us, idosch@...sch.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: bridge: use switchdev for port flags set through
 sysfs too

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Sun,  7 Feb 2021 21:47:33 +0200 you wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> 
> Looking through patchwork I don't see that there was any consensus to
> use switchdev notifiers only in case of netlink provided port flags but
> not sysfs (as a sort of deprecation, punishment or anything like that),
> so we should probably keep the user interface consistent in terms of
> functionality.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net] net: bridge: use switchdev for port flags set through sysfs too
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/8043c845b63a

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html