[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6c99dba-aea9-304c-2246-e24632955479@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:17:42 +0100
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
Junwei Zhang <Jerry.Zhang@....com>,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix potential integer overflow on shift of a
int
Am 08.02.21 um 00:07 schrieb Colin King:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> The left shift of int 32 bit integer constant 1 is evaluated using 32
> bit arithmetic and then assigned to an unsigned 64 bit integer. In the
> case where *frag is 32 or more this can lead to an oveflow. Avoid this
> by shifting 1ULL.
Well that can't happen. Take a look at the code in that function:
> max_frag = 31;
...
> if (*frag >= max_frag) {
> *frag = max_frag;
> *frag_end = end & ~((1ULL << max_frag) - 1);
> } else {
> *frag_end = start + (1 << *frag);
> }
But I'm fine with applying the patch if it silences your warning.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow")
> Fixes: dfcd99f6273e ("drm/amdgpu: meld together VM fragment and huge page handling")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> index 9d19078246c8..53a925600510 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> @@ -1412,7 +1412,7 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_fragment(struct amdgpu_vm_update_params *params,
> *frag = max_frag;
> *frag_end = end & ~((1ULL << max_frag) - 1);
> } else {
> - *frag_end = start + (1 << *frag);
> + *frag_end = start + (1ULL << *frag);
> }
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists