[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdV72fkpYgGqgebHfnN+VcVv04YvPxazpu1ZYsjMFP6Ow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 15:20:17 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] gpio: ep93xx: Fix single irqchip with multi gpiochips
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:00 AM Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me> wrote:
>
> Fixes the following warnings which results in interrupts disabled on
> port B/F:
>
> gpio gpiochip1: (B): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver.
> gpio gpiochip5: (F): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver.
>
> - added separate irqchip for each interrupt capable gpiochip
> - provided unique names for each irqchip
...
> +static void ep93xx_init_irq_chip(struct device *dev, struct irq_chip *ic, const char *label)
> +{
> + ic->name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "gpio-irq-%s", label);
Is the label being NULL okay?
> + ic->irq_ack = ep93xx_gpio_irq_ack;
> + ic->irq_mask_ack = ep93xx_gpio_irq_mask_ack;
> + ic->irq_mask = ep93xx_gpio_irq_mask;
> + ic->irq_unmask = ep93xx_gpio_irq_unmask;
> + ic->irq_set_type = ep93xx_gpio_irq_type;
> +}
...
> - girq->chip = &ep93xx_gpio_irq_chip;
I don't see where you remove that static structure.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists