[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210208050045.zjm2s27ye7cxgfxq@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:30:45 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: drivers/opp/of.c:842:12: warning: stack frame size of 2064 bytes
in function '_of_add_opp_table_v2'
On 07-02-21, 04:09, kernel test robot wrote:
> f47b72a15a9679 drivers/base/power/opp/of.c Viresh Kumar 2016-05-05 841 /* Initializes OPP tables based on new bindings */
> 5ed4cecd75e902 drivers/opp/of.c Viresh Kumar 2018-09-12 @842 static int _of_add_opp_table_v2(struct device *dev, struct opp_table *opp_table)
> f47b72a15a9679 drivers/base/power/opp/of.c Viresh Kumar 2016-05-05 843 {
> f47b72a15a9679 drivers/base/power/opp/of.c Viresh Kumar 2016-05-05 844 struct device_node *np;
> 283d55e68d8a0f drivers/opp/of.c Viresh Kumar 2018-09-07 845 int ret, count = 0, pstate_count = 0;
> 3ba98324e81add drivers/opp/of.c Viresh Kumar 2016-11-18 846 struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
I am not able to figure out why the stack frame warning will shoot off
for this routine, using just pointers, no big allocations on stack..
False positive ?
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists