linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 00/23] arm64: Early CPU feature override, and applications to VHE, BTI and PAuth

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 8 Feb 2021 14:32:49 +0000
From:   Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@...gle.com>,
        Ajay Patil <pajay@....qualcomm.com>,
        Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@...eaurora.org>,
        Srinivas Ramana <sramana@...eaurora.org>,
        Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/23] arm64: Early CPU feature override, and
 applications to VHE, BTI and PAuth

Hi Marc,

On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 09:57:09AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> It recently came to light that there is a need to be able to override
> some CPU features very early on, before the kernel is fully up and
> running. The reasons for this range from specific feature support
> (such as using Protected KVM on VHE HW, which is the main motivation
> for this work) to errata workaround (a feature is broken on a CPU and
> needs to be turned off, or rather not enabled).
> 
> This series tries to offer a limited framework for this kind of
> problems, by allowing a set of options to be passed on the
> command-line and altering the feature set that the cpufeature
> subsystem exposes to the rest of the kernel. Note that this doesn't
> change anything for code that directly uses the CPU ID registers.

I applied this locally, but I'm seeing consistent boot failure under QEMU when
KASAN is enabled. I tried sprinkling some __no_sanitize_address annotations
around (see below) but it didn't help. The culprit appears to be
early_fdt_map(), but looking a bit more closely, I'm really nervous about the
way we call into C functions from __primary_switched. Remember -- this code
runs _twice_ when KASLR is active: before and after the randomization. This
also means that any memory writes the first time around can be lost due to
the D-cache invalidation when (re-)creating the kernel page-tables.

Will

--->8

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c
index dffb16682330..751ed55261b5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static __init void parse_cmdline(void)
 /* Keep checkers quiet */
 void init_feature_override(void);
 
-asmlinkage void __init init_feature_override(void)
+asmlinkage void __init __no_sanitize_address init_feature_override(void)
 {
        int i;
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
index 61845c0821d9..33581de05d2e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
@@ -170,12 +170,12 @@ static void __init smp_build_mpidr_hash(void)
 
 static void *early_fdt_ptr __initdata;
 
-void __init *get_early_fdt_ptr(void)
+void __init __no_sanitize_address *get_early_fdt_ptr(void)
 {
        return early_fdt_ptr;
 }
 
-asmlinkage void __init early_fdt_map(u64 dt_phys)
+asmlinkage void __init __no_sanitize_address early_fdt_map(u64 dt_phys)
 {
        int fdt_size;