[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210208145806.763930801@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 16:00:37 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 11/43] futex: Use pi_state_update_owner() in put_pi_state()
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
[ Upstream commit 6ccc84f917d33312eb2846bd7b567639f585ad6d ]
No point in open coding it. This way it gains the extra sanity checks.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/futex.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -879,10 +879,7 @@ static void put_pi_state(struct futex_pi
* and has cleaned up the pi_state already
*/
if (pi_state->owner) {
- raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->owner->pi_lock);
- list_del_init(&pi_state->list);
- raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->owner->pi_lock);
-
+ pi_state_update_owner(pi_state, NULL);
rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists