[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210208150618.GI8233@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 16:06:18 +0100
From: Sascha Hauer <sha@...gutronix.de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Youling Tang <tangyouling@...ngson.cn>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: fix ignoring return value warning
Hi Dan,
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 04:45:17PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 05:23:28PM +0800, Youling Tang wrote:
> > Fix the below ignoring return value warning for device_reset.
> >
> > drivers/staging/mt7621-dma/mtk-hsdma.c:685:2: warning: ignoring return value
> > of function declared with 'warn_unused_result' attribute [-Wunused-result]
> > device_reset(&pdev->dev);
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/staging/ralink-gdma/ralink-gdma.c:836:2: warning: ignoring return value
> > of function declared with 'warn_unused_result' attribute [-Wunused-result]
> > device_reset(&pdev->dev);
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~
> >
>
> We can't really do this sort of fix without the hardware to test it.
> This could be the correct fix or perhaps switching to device_reset_optional()
> is the correct fix. We can't know unless we have the hardware to test.
When device_reset() is the wrong function then adding a return value
check will turn this into a runtime error for those who have the
hardware which will hopefully trigger them to tell us why reset_device
is wrong for them.
At least for a staging driver I find this procedure opportune.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists