[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f696b13-2475-49f2-5d75-f2120e159142@sholland.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 00:31:34 -0600
From: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
To: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Corentin Labbe <clabbe@...libre.com>
Cc: Ondrej Jirman <megous@...ous.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: mv64xxx: Fix check for missing clock
On 2/8/21 12:28 AM, Samuel Holland wrote:
> In commit e5c02cf54154 ("i2c: mv64xxx: Add runtime PM support"), error
> pointers to optional clocks were replaced by NULL to simplify the resume
> callback implementation. However, that commit missed that the IS_ERR
> check in mv64xxx_of_config should be replaced with a NULL check. As a
> result, the check always passes, even for an invalid device tree.
Sorry, please ignore this unrelated patch. I accidentally copied it to
the wrong directory before sending this series.
Samuel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists