[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210209015855.GA54680@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 09:58:55 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Daniel Kiss <Daniel.Kiss@....com>,
Denis Nikitin <denik@...omium.org>,
Al Grant <al.grant@....com>, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] perf cs-etm: Fix bitmap for option
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 01:46:41PM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 11:08:29PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> >
> > When set option with macros ETM_OPT_CTXTID and ETM_OPT_TS, it wrongly
> > takes these two values (14 and 28 prespectively) as bit masks, but
> > actually both are the offset for bits. But this doesn't lead to
> > further failure due to the AND logic operation will be always true for
> > ETM_OPT_CTXTID / ETM_OPT_TS.
> >
> > This patch defines new independent macros (rather than using the
> > "config" bits) for requesting the "contextid" and "timestamp" for
> > cs_etm_set_option().
> >
> > [leoy: Extract the change as a separate patch for easier review]
>
> This should go just above your name - see below.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> [Extract the change as a separate patch for easier review]
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c | 12 ++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
> > index bd446aba64f7..c25c878fd06c 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
> > @@ -156,6 +156,10 @@ static int cs_etm_set_timestamp(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > +#define ETM_SET_OPT_CTXTID (1 << 0)
> > +#define ETM_SET_OPT_TS (1 << 1)
> > +#define ETM_SET_OPT_MASK (ETM_SET_OPT_CTXTID | ETM_SET_OPT_TS)
> > +
>
> I would much rather see this fixed with the BIT() macro as it is done in the
> rest of this set than defining new constant.
>
> With the above:
>
> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
>
> I have picked up the kernel portion of this set. I suggest you fix the above
> and send another revision to Arnaldo with my RBs.
Will do this. Thanks for suggestion, Mathieu.
Leo
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists