[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <accc057c-e639-7510-f722-4a4d166c80b6@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 19:17:59 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: remove lru_add_drain_all in alloc_contig_range
On 09.02.21 18:50, Minchan Kim wrote:
> __alloc_contig_migrate_range already has lru_add_drain_all call
> via migrate_prep. It's necessary to move LRU taget pages into
> LRU list to be able to isolated. However, lru_add_drain_all call
> after __alloc_contig_migrate_range is called is pointless.
>
> This patch removes it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 6446778cbc6b..f8fbee73dd6d 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -8603,8 +8603,6 @@ int alloc_contig_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> * isolated thus they won't get removed from buddy.
> */
>
> - lru_add_drain_all();
> -
> order = 0;
> outer_start = start;
> while (!PageBuddy(pfn_to_page(outer_start))) {
>
I was expecting some magical reason why this is still required but I am
not able to find a compelling one. Maybe this is really some historical
artifact.
Let's see if other people know why this call here still exists.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists