[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1165c0f2-134e-932d-e427-3b65c659108d@bytedance.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 10:21:22 +0800
From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] psi: Remove the redundant psi_task_tick
在 2021/2/9 上午12:45, Johannes Weiner 写道:
> On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 07:56:42PM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote:
>> From: zhouchengming <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
>>
>> When the current task in a cgroup is in_memstall, the corresponding psi_group
>> is in PSI_MEM_FULL state
> This is correct.
>
>> so we can remove the redundant psi_task_tick from scheduler_tick to
>> save this periodic cost.
> But this isn't. It IS the task tick that makes it so. The state change
> tracking counts MEMSTALL tasks and ONCPU tasks, but it doesn't check
> whether the ONCPU task is the MEMSTALL one.
Yes, you are right, I messed them up... will take a closer look at the code later.
Thanks.
> It would be possible to incorporate that into psi_task_switch(), but
> you have to be careful with the branches because that path is often
> hotter than the timer tick.
>
> This patch by itself breaks page reclaim detection, so NAK.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists