[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YCLeCPWy6samik/W@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 20:10:00 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Wonhyuk Yang <vvghjk1234@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 051/120] memblock: do not start bottom-up
allocations with kernel_end
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 12:07:57PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
>
> > From: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
> >
> > [ Upstream commit 2dcb3964544177c51853a210b6ad400de78ef17d ]
> >
> > With kaslr the kernel image is placed at a random place, so starting the
> > bottom-up allocation with the kernel_end can result in an allocation
> > failure and a warning like this one:
>
> Not sure if this is ready for stable yet (including stable branches 4.19
> and 5.4), since it seems to uncover latent bugs in x86 early memory
> reservation. I asked about this issue here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87ft26yuwg.fsf@manicouagan.localdomain/
If there are fixes for this that get merged, please make sure they get
tagged properly to go to the stable trees as well.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists