[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzaMuMq0fwd6DvSx3VuHpMMDhs8tC-LhQ6q3RY-4W0w0zg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 21:20:54 -0800
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
john fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Simplify the calculation of variables
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:27 PM Jiapeng Chong
<jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> Fix the following coccicheck warnings:
>
> ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c:954:28-30: WARNING !A || A &&
> B is equivalent to !A || B.
>
> ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c:932:28-30: WARNING !A || A &&
> B is equivalent to !A || B.
>
> ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c:909:28-30: WARNING !A || A &&
> B is equivalent to !A || B.
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
This doesn't apply cleanly onto bpf-next anymore. Please rebase and
re-submit. Make sure to include [PATCH bpf-next] prefix in your email
subject. Thanks!
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
> index 1e722ee..98ad4a2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
> @@ -906,7 +906,7 @@ static void *worker_testapp_validate(void *arg)
> ksft_print_msg("Destroying socket\n");
> }
>
> - if (!opt_bidi || (opt_bidi && bidi_pass)) {
> + if (!opt_bidi || bidi_pass) {
> xsk_socket__delete(((struct ifobject *)arg)->xsk->xsk);
> (void)xsk_umem__delete(((struct ifobject *)arg)->umem->umem);
> }
> @@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ static void testapp_validate(void)
> pthread_mutex_lock(&sync_mutex);
>
> /*Spawn RX thread */
> - if (!opt_bidi || (opt_bidi && !bidi_pass)) {
> + if (!opt_bidi || !bidi_pass) {
> if (pthread_create(&t0, &attr, worker_testapp_validate, (void *)ifdict[1]))
> exit_with_error(errno);
> } else if (opt_bidi && bidi_pass) {
> @@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ static void testapp_validate(void)
> pthread_mutex_unlock(&sync_mutex);
>
> /*Spawn TX thread */
> - if (!opt_bidi || (opt_bidi && !bidi_pass)) {
> + if (!opt_bidi || !bidi_pass) {
> if (pthread_create(&t1, &attr, worker_testapp_validate, (void *)ifdict[0]))
> exit_with_error(errno);
> } else if (opt_bidi && bidi_pass) {
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists