[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210209081408.GA1703597@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 08:14:08 +0000
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, jgg@...pe.ca,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: provide a sane PTE walking API for modules
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 07:18:56PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Fair enough. I would expect that pretty much everyone using follow_pfn will
> at least want to switch to this one (as it's less bad and not impossible to
> use correctly), but I'll squash this in:
Daniel looked into them, so he may correct me, but the other follow_pfn
users and their destiny are:
- SGX, which is not modular and I think I just saw a patch to kill them
- v4l videobuf and frame vector: I think those are going away
entirely as they implement a rather broken pre-dmabuf P2P scheme
- vfio: should use MMU notifiers eventually
Daniel, what happened to your follow_pfn series?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists