linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] drm/fourcc: Switch to %p4cc format modifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210209090302.GB32460@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Feb 2021 11:03:02 +0200
From:   Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        "open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] drm/fourcc: Switch to %p4cc format modifier

Hi Daniel,

Thanks for the comments.

On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 08:27:10AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 9:20 PM Sakari Ailus
> <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Instead of constructing the FourCC code manually, use the %p4cc printk
> > modifier to print it. Also leave a message to avoid using this function.
> >
> > The next step would be to convert the users to use %p4cc directly instead
> > and removing the function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fourcc.c | 16 +++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fourcc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fourcc.c
> > index 03262472059c..4ff40f2f27c0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fourcc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fourcc.c
> > @@ -30,11 +30,6 @@
> >  #include <drm/drm_device.h>
> >  #include <drm/drm_fourcc.h>
> >
> > -static char printable_char(int c)
> > -{
> > -       return isascii(c) && isprint(c) ? c : '?';
> > -}
> > -
> >  /**
> >   * drm_mode_legacy_fb_format - compute drm fourcc code from legacy description
> >   * @bpp: bits per pixels
> > @@ -134,17 +129,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_driver_legacy_fb_format);
> >   * drm_get_format_name - fill a string with a drm fourcc format's name
> >   * @format: format to compute name of
> >   * @buf: caller-supplied buffer
> > + *
> > + * Please use %p4cc printk format modifier instead of this function.
> 
> I think would be nice if we could roll this out and outright delete
> this one here ... Quick git grep says there's not that many, and %p4cc
> is quite a bit shorter than what we have now.

Sounds good; I can submit patches for that but I think I'll do that once we
have the %p4cc modifier in.

-- 
Regards,

Sakari Ailus