lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 9 Feb 2021 10:19:33 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, jgg@...pe.ca,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: provide a sane PTE walking API for modules

On 09/02/21 09:14, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 07:18:56PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Fair enough.  I would expect that pretty much everyone using follow_pfn will
>> at least want to switch to this one (as it's less bad and not impossible to
>> use correctly), but I'll squash this in:
> 
> 
> Daniel looked into them, so he may correct me, but the other follow_pfn
> users and their destiny are:
> 
>   - SGX, which is not modular and I think I just saw a patch to kill them
>   - v4l videobuf and frame vector: I think those are going away
>     entirely as they implement a rather broken pre-dmabuf P2P scheme
>   - vfio: should use MMU notifiers eventually

Yes, I'm thinking mostly of vfio, which could use follow_pte as a 
short-term fix for just the missing permission check.

There's also s390 PCI, which is also not modular.

Paolo

> Daniel, what happened to your follow_pfn series?


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ