[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8e4452a2-e685-5438-0833-1a56ed852e05@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 10:21:21 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Use kvm_pfn_t for local PFN variable in
hva_to_pfn_remapped()
On 08/02/21 21:19, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Use kvm_pfn_t, a.k.a. u64, for the local 'pfn' variable when retrieving
> a so called "remapped" hva/pfn pair. In theory, the hva could resolve to
> a pfn in high memory on a 32-bit kernel.
>
> This bug was inadvertantly exposed by commit bd2fae8da794 ("KVM: do not
> assume PTE is writable after follow_pfn"), which added an error PFN value
> to the mix, causing gcc to comlain about overflowing the unsigned long.
>
> arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c: In function ‘hva_to_pfn_remapped’:
> include/linux/kvm_host.h:89:30: error: conversion from ‘long long unsigned int’
> to ‘long unsigned int’ changes value from
> ‘9218868437227405314’ to ‘2’ [-Werror=overflow]
> 89 | #define KVM_PFN_ERR_RO_FAULT (KVM_PFN_ERR_MASK + 2)
> | ^
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:1935:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘KVM_PFN_ERR_RO_FAULT’
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Fixes: add6a0cd1c5b ("KVM: MMU: try to fix up page faults before giving up")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> ---
>
> I don't actually know that it's possible for a remapped pfn to be a 64-bit
> value on a stock kernel. But, backporting a one-liner is far easier and
> safer than trying to audit all possible flows. :-)
>
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index ee4ac2618ec5..001b9de4e727 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -1906,7 +1906,7 @@ static int hva_to_pfn_remapped(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> bool write_fault, bool *writable,
> kvm_pfn_t *p_pfn)
> {
> - unsigned long pfn;
> + kvm_pfn_t pfn;
> pte_t *ptep;
> spinlock_t *ptl;
> int r;
>
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists