[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <db5dd593cfd8b428ce44c1cce7484d887fa5e67c.1612869229.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:48:08 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Tushar Khandelwal <Tushar.Khandelwal@....com>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH Resend] mailbox: arm_mhuv2: Fix sparse warnings
This patch fixes a bunch of sparse warnings in the newly added arm_mhuv2
driver.
drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:506:24: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:506:24: expected void const volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:506:24: got unsigned int [usertype] *
drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:547:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:547:42: expected unsigned int [usertype] *reg
drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:547:42: got unsigned int [noderef] __iomem *
drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:625:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:625:42: expected unsigned int [usertype] *reg
drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:625:42: got unsigned int [noderef] __iomem *
drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:972:24: warning: dereference of noderef expression
drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:973:22: warning: dereference of noderef expression
drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:993:25: warning: dereference of noderef expression
drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:1026:24: warning: dereference of noderef expression
drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:1027:22: warning: dereference of noderef expression
drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c:1048:17: warning: dereference of noderef expression
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
Hi,
This should have been merged to 5.11-rc since the driver got introduced
in 5.11-rc1 itself. I don't see it queued for linux-next as well. It was
posted over 6 weeks back and no response is received yet:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/db5dd593cfd8b428ce44c1cce7484d887fa5e67c.1609303304.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/
Would be good if this can still go in 5.11.
drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c b/drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c
index 67fb10885bb4..8223c1005254 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c
@@ -238,19 +238,19 @@ struct mhuv2_mbox_chan_priv {
};
/* Macro for reading a bitfield within a physically mapped packed struct */
-#define readl_relaxed_bitfield(_regptr, _field) \
+#define readl_relaxed_bitfield(_regptr, _type, _field) \
({ \
u32 _regval; \
_regval = readl_relaxed((_regptr)); \
- (*(typeof((_regptr)))(&_regval))._field; \
+ (*(_type *)(&_regval))._field; \
})
/* Macro for writing a bitfield within a physically mapped packed struct */
-#define writel_relaxed_bitfield(_value, _regptr, _field) \
+#define writel_relaxed_bitfield(_value, _regptr, _type, _field) \
({ \
u32 _regval; \
_regval = readl_relaxed(_regptr); \
- (*(typeof(_regptr))(&_regval))._field = _value; \
+ (*(_type *)(&_regval))._field = _value; \
writel_relaxed(_regval, _regptr); \
})
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static const struct mhuv2_protocol_ops mhuv2_data_transfer_ops = {
/* Interrupt handlers */
-static struct mbox_chan *get_irq_chan_comb(struct mhuv2 *mhu, u32 *reg)
+static struct mbox_chan *get_irq_chan_comb(struct mhuv2 *mhu, u32 __iomem *reg)
{
struct mbox_chan *chans = mhu->mbox.chans;
int channel = 0, i, offset = 0, windows, protocol, ch_wn;
@@ -969,8 +969,8 @@ static int mhuv2_tx_init(struct amba_device *adev, struct mhuv2 *mhu,
mhu->mbox.ops = &mhuv2_sender_ops;
mhu->send = reg;
- mhu->windows = readl_relaxed_bitfield(&mhu->send->mhu_cfg, num_ch);
- mhu->minor = readl_relaxed_bitfield(&mhu->send->aidr, arch_minor_rev);
+ mhu->windows = readl_relaxed_bitfield(&mhu->send->mhu_cfg, struct mhu_cfg_t, num_ch);
+ mhu->minor = readl_relaxed_bitfield(&mhu->send->aidr, struct aidr_t, arch_minor_rev);
spin_lock_init(&mhu->doorbell_pending_lock);
@@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ static int mhuv2_tx_init(struct amba_device *adev, struct mhuv2 *mhu,
mhu->mbox.txdone_poll = false;
mhu->irq = adev->irq[0];
- writel_relaxed_bitfield(1, &mhu->send->int_en, chcomb);
+ writel_relaxed_bitfield(1, &mhu->send->int_en, struct int_en_t, chcomb);
/* Disable all channel interrupts */
for (i = 0; i < mhu->windows; i++)
@@ -1023,8 +1023,8 @@ static int mhuv2_rx_init(struct amba_device *adev, struct mhuv2 *mhu,
mhu->mbox.ops = &mhuv2_receiver_ops;
mhu->recv = reg;
- mhu->windows = readl_relaxed_bitfield(&mhu->recv->mhu_cfg, num_ch);
- mhu->minor = readl_relaxed_bitfield(&mhu->recv->aidr, arch_minor_rev);
+ mhu->windows = readl_relaxed_bitfield(&mhu->recv->mhu_cfg, struct mhu_cfg_t, num_ch);
+ mhu->minor = readl_relaxed_bitfield(&mhu->recv->aidr, struct aidr_t, arch_minor_rev);
mhu->irq = adev->irq[0];
if (!mhu->irq) {
@@ -1045,7 +1045,7 @@ static int mhuv2_rx_init(struct amba_device *adev, struct mhuv2 *mhu,
writel_relaxed(0xFFFFFFFF, &mhu->recv->ch_wn[i].mask_set);
if (mhu->minor)
- writel_relaxed_bitfield(1, &mhu->recv->int_en, chcomb);
+ writel_relaxed_bitfield(1, &mhu->recv->int_en, struct int_en_t, chcomb);
return 0;
}
--
2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af
Powered by blists - more mailing lists