[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877dnhv4lg.fsf@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 13:54:35 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
johannes@...solutions.net, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: WARNING: suspicious RCU usage (5.11.0-rc7+ #1812 Tainted: G)
+ ath10k list
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 08:04:27PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> Hi Peter & Paul,
>>
>> The traces below are present in the boot dmesg log on my Dell XPS13 9360.
>>
>> I haven't had the time to look into this in detail yet, but here it goes in
>> case you know what's going on already.
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>>
>> [ 86.762542] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready
>>
>> [ 86.764298] =============================
>> [ 86.764300] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
>> [ 86.764302] 5.11.0-rc7+ #1812 Tainted: G I
>> [ 86.764305] -----------------------------
>> [ 86.764307]
>> /scratch/rafael/work/linux-pm/include/linux/rhashtable.h:594
>> suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
>> [ 86.764309]
>> other info that might help us debug this:
>>
>> [ 86.764311]
>> rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
>> [ 86.764313] no locks held by swapper/1/0.
>> [ 86.764316]
>> stack backtrace:
>> [ 86.764318] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Tainted: G I 5.11.0-rc7+
>> #1812
>> [ 86.764321] Hardware name: Dell Inc. XPS 13 9360/, BIOS 1.3.5 05/08/2017
>> [ 86.764323] Call Trace:
>> [ 86.764325] <IRQ>
>> [ 86.764328] dump_stack+0x77/0x97
>> [ 86.764336] ieee80211_find_sta_by_ifaddr+0x218/0x2e0 [mac80211]
>> [ 86.764380] ?
>> ath10k_wmi_tlv_op_pull_mgmt_tx_bundle_compl_ev+0xe0/0xe0
>> [ath10k_core]
>> [ 86.764399] ath10k_wmi_tlv_parse_peer_stats_info+0x2a/0x70 [ath10k_core]
>> [ 86.764411] ath10k_wmi_tlv_iter+0x56/0xd0 [ath10k_core]
>> [ 86.764424] ath10k_wmi_tlv_op_rx+0x75a/0xa30 [ath10k_core]
>> [ 86.764438] ath10k_htc_rx_completion_handler+0xe8/0x120 [ath10k_core]
>> [ 86.764452] ? ath10k_htc_process_trailer+0x290/0x290 [ath10k_core]
>> [ 86.764462] ath10k_pci_process_rx_cb+0x117/0x180 [ath10k_pci]
>> [ 86.764472] ? ath10k_ce_per_engine_service+0x4c/0x80 [ath10k_core]
>> [ 86.764490] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x47/0x60
>> [ 86.764504] ath10k_ce_per_engine_service+0x5d/0x80 [ath10k_core]
>> [ 86.764524] ath10k_ce_per_engine_service_any+0x6a/0xa0 [ath10k_core]
>> [ 86.764543] ath10k_pci_napi_poll+0x44/0x110 [ath10k_pci]
>> [ 86.764552] net_rx_action+0x15d/0x4e0
>> [ 86.764570] __do_softirq+0xeb/0x492
>> [ 86.764583] ? handle_fasteoi_irq+0x150/0x150
>> [ 86.764591] asm_call_irq_on_stack+0x12/0x20
>> [ 86.764598] </IRQ>
>> [ 86.764602] do_softirq_own_stack+0x81/0xa0
>> [ 86.764609] irq_exit_rcu+0xcd/0xe0
>> [ 86.764614] common_interrupt+0xfe/0x230
>> [ 86.764623] asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40
>> [ 86.764626] RIP: 0010:cpuidle_enter_state+0x109/0x4a0
>> [ 86.764631] Code: 02 00 00 31 ff e8 b7 40 8e ff 45 84 ff 74 12 9c
>> 58 f6 c4 02 0f 85 10 03 00 00 31 ff e8 70 42 96 ff e8 bb a2 9d ff fb
>> 45 85 f6 <0f> 88 12 01 00 00 49 63 d6 4c 2b 24 24 48 8d 04 52 48 8d
>> 04 82 49
>> [ 86.764634] RSP: 0018:ffffc900000e3e80 EFLAGS: 00000202
>> [ 86.764638] RAX: 00000000000e8d89 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 0000000000000000
>> [ 86.764641] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff82392561 RDI: ffffffff82344126
>> [ 86.764643] RBP: ffffe8ffffc93300 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
>> [ 86.764645] R10: ffffc900000e3e60 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 00000014338d5797
>> [ 86.764647] R13: ffffffff827e6d60 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 0000000000000000
>> [ 86.764667] cpuidle_enter+0x29/0x40
>> [ 86.764672] do_idle+0x22d/0x2b0
>> [ 86.764682] cpu_startup_entry+0x19/0x20
>> [ 86.764686] start_secondary+0x125/0x160
>> [ 86.764691] secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xb0/0xbb
>>
>
> AFAICT that's a simple 'use RCU without holding rcu_read_lock' warning.
> I've not dug through ath10k to see who should be doing rcu_read_lock,
> but the few places I did look at don't seem to have changed recently.
Just this morning I applied a patch which should fix this:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=ath-next&id=2615e3cdbd9c0e864f5906279c952a309871d225
Please let me know if it fixes the issue.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists