[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210209123746.GD11264@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:37:46 +0100
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Jinyang He <hejinyang@...ngson.cn>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: process: Fix no previous prototype warning
On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 04:52:36PM +0800, Jinyang He wrote:
> unwind_stack_by_address and unwind_stack need <asm/stacktrace.h>.
> arch_align_stack needs <asm/exec.h>
>
> link: https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org/thread/ZPL2RRA6RZKRQZI5IGOVLFXN2GVZBN3L/
> Fixes: ("MIPS: process: Remove unnecessary headers inclusion")
this Fixes is broken, it's missing a git hash. But there is no reason
for a fixes tag, because it "only" removed a warning, but doesn't fix
a bug. So I've removed it while applying the patch.
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jinyang He <hejinyang@...ngson.cn>
> ---
> arch/mips/kernel/process.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
applied to mips-next.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists