linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: Fix NULL pointer dereference error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 Feb 2021 18:15:32 +0530
From:   Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To:     Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...il.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
CC:     <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: Fix NULL pointer dereference
 error

Hi Peter,

On 09/02/21 5:53 pm, Péter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Hi Kishon,
> 
> On 2/9/21 11:00 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> bcdma_get_*() and udma_get_*() checks if bchan/rchan/tchan/rflow is
>> already allocated by checking if it has a NON NULL value. For the
>> error cases, bchan/rchan/tchan/rflow will have error value
>> and bcdma_get_*() and udma_get_*() considers this as already allocated
>> (PASS) since the error values are NON NULL. This results in
>> NULL pointer dereference error while de-referencing
>> bchan/rchan/tchan/rflow.
> 
> I think this can happen when a channel request fails and we get a second
> request coming and faces with the not cleanup up tchan/rchan/bchan/rflow
> from the previous failure.
> Interesting that I have not faced with this, but it is a valid oversight
> from me.

Thank you for reviewing.

Got into this issue when all the PCIe endpoint functions were requesting
for a MEMCOPY channel (total 22 endpoint functions) specifically in
bcdma_get_bchan() where the scenario you mentioned above happened.

Vignesh asked me to fix it for all udma_get_*().
> 
>> Reset the value of bchan/rchan/tchan/rflow to NULL if the allocation
>> actually fails.
>>
>> Fixes: 017794739702 ("dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: Initial support for K3 BCDMA")
>> Fixes: 25dcb5dd7b7c ("dmaengine: ti: New driver for K3 UDMA")
> 
> Will this patch apply at any of these?
> 25dcb5dd7b7c does not have BCDMA (bchan)
> 017794739702 does not contain PKTDMA (tflow)

I can probably split this patch
017794739702 for bchan and 25dcb5dd7b7c for bchan/rchan/tchan/rflow

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
>> index 298460438bb4..aa4ef583ff83 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
>> @@ -1330,6 +1330,7 @@ static int bcdma_get_bchan(struct udma_chan *uc)
>>  {
>>  	struct udma_dev *ud = uc->ud;
>>  	enum udma_tp_level tpl;
>> +	int ret;
>>  
>>  	if (uc->bchan) {
>>  		dev_dbg(ud->dev, "chan%d: already have bchan%d allocated\n",
>> @@ -1347,8 +1348,11 @@ static int bcdma_get_bchan(struct udma_chan *uc)
>>  		tpl = ud->bchan_tpl.levels - 1;
>>  
>>  	uc->bchan = __udma_reserve_bchan(ud, tpl, -1);
>> -	if (IS_ERR(uc->bchan))
>> -		return PTR_ERR(uc->bchan);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(uc->bchan)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(uc->bchan);
>> +		uc->bchan = NULL;
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	uc->tchan = uc->bchan;
>>  
>> @@ -1358,6 +1362,7 @@ static int bcdma_get_bchan(struct udma_chan *uc)
>>  static int udma_get_tchan(struct udma_chan *uc)
>>  {
>>  	struct udma_dev *ud = uc->ud;
>> +	int ret;
>>  
>>  	if (uc->tchan) {
>>  		dev_dbg(ud->dev, "chan%d: already have tchan%d allocated\n",
>> @@ -1372,8 +1377,11 @@ static int udma_get_tchan(struct udma_chan *uc)
>>  	 */
>>  	uc->tchan = __udma_reserve_tchan(ud, uc->config.channel_tpl,
>>  					 uc->config.mapped_channel_id);
>> -	if (IS_ERR(uc->tchan))
>> -		return PTR_ERR(uc->tchan);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(uc->tchan)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(uc->tchan);
>> +		uc->tchan = NULL;
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	if (ud->tflow_cnt) {
>>  		int tflow_id;
>> @@ -1403,6 +1411,7 @@ static int udma_get_tchan(struct udma_chan *uc)
>>  static int udma_get_rchan(struct udma_chan *uc)
>>  {
>>  	struct udma_dev *ud = uc->ud;
>> +	int ret;
>>  
>>  	if (uc->rchan) {
>>  		dev_dbg(ud->dev, "chan%d: already have rchan%d allocated\n",
>> @@ -1417,8 +1426,13 @@ static int udma_get_rchan(struct udma_chan *uc)
>>  	 */
>>  	uc->rchan = __udma_reserve_rchan(ud, uc->config.channel_tpl,
>>  					 uc->config.mapped_channel_id);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(uc->rchan)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(uc->rchan);
>> +		uc->rchan = NULL;
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>>  
>> -	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(uc->rchan);
>> +	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static int udma_get_chan_pair(struct udma_chan *uc)
>> @@ -1472,6 +1486,7 @@ static int udma_get_chan_pair(struct udma_chan *uc)
>>  static int udma_get_rflow(struct udma_chan *uc, int flow_id)
>>  {
>>  	struct udma_dev *ud = uc->ud;
>> +	int ret;
>>  
>>  	if (!uc->rchan) {
>>  		dev_err(ud->dev, "chan%d: does not have rchan??\n", uc->id);
>> @@ -1485,6 +1500,11 @@ static int udma_get_rflow(struct udma_chan *uc, int flow_id)
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	uc->rflow = __udma_get_rflow(ud, flow_id);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(uc->rflow)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(uc->rflow);
>> +		uc->rflow = NULL;
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(uc->rflow);
> 
> return 0;

Will fix this.

Thanks
Kishon