[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YCKH0HvTxeYKg1xf@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 14:02:08 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 14/36] media: rkisp1: uapi: change hist_bins
array type from __u16 to __u32
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 01:45:35PM +0100, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
>
>
> Am 08.02.21 um 21:46 schrieb Hans Verkuil:
> > On 08/02/2021 18:57, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > From: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com>
> > >
> > > [ Upstream commit 31f190e0ccac8b75d33fdc95a797c526cf9b149e ]
> > >
> > > Each entry in the array is a 20 bits value composed of 16 bits unsigned
> > > integer and 4 bits fractional part. So the type should change to __u32.
> > > In addition add a documentation of how the measurements are done.
> >
> > Dafna, Helen, does it make sense at all to backport these three patches to
> > when rkisp1 was a staging driver?
> >
> > I would be inclined not to backport this.
>
> I also don't think it makes sense since this changes the uapi and it is not really a bug fix.
Why was it ok to change the uapi in a newer kernel and not an older one?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists