[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5055b9b4-2808-8816-d50c-e651bd88a7c3@digikod.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 14:59:14 +0100
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>
Cc: dwmw2@...radead.org, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, masahiroy@...nel.org,
michal.lkml@...kovi.net, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com,
ardb@...nel.org, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
lszubowi@...hat.com, javierm@...hat.com, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: Conflict with Mickaël Salaün's blacklist patches [was [PATCH v5 0/4] Add EFI_CERT_X509_GUID support for dbx/mokx entries]
Hi David,
The only commit causing issues is commit f78e50c8f750 ("certs: Factor
out the blacklist hash creation"). I think my last patch fix the issue,
and I'm testing with the UEFI DBX, but I don't understand why this
change would have an impact. In the meantime you can push Eric's commits
first, I'll adapt my changes.
Mickaël
On 09/02/2021 14:14, David Howells wrote:
>
> Hi Eric, Mickaël,
>
> Do we have a consensus on this? From what's written here, I don't think I can
> ask Linus to pull the merge of your two branches. I feel that I probably need
> to push Eric's first as that fixes a CVE if I can't offer a merge.
>
> David
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists