[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YCKmhnoSKgdYqxOL@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:13:10 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] preempt: select PREEMPT_DYNAMIC under PREEMPTION instead
of PREEMPT
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 02:45:37PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> PREEMPT_RT and PREEMPT both needs PREEMPT_DYNAMIC to build, so move
> selection of PREEMPT_DYNAMIC to the common denominator, PREEMPTION.
I'm confused, why would you want PREEMPT_DYNAMIC for PREEMPT_RT ?
PREEMPT_RT without full preemption is just plain daft, no?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists