linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] sched/fair: Burstable CFS bandwidth controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 Feb 2021 05:28:43 -0500
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Odin Ugedal <odin@...d.al>
Cc:     changhuaixin@...ux.alibaba.com, bsegall@...gle.com,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mgorman@...e.de, mingo@...hat.com, pauld@...head.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, pjt@...gle.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        shanpeic@...ux.alibaba.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        xiyou.wangcong@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] sched/fair: Burstable CFS bandwidth controller

Hello,

On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 02:17:19PM +0100, Odin Ugedal wrote:
> A am not that familiar how cross subsystem patches like these are handled, but
> I am still adding the Tejun Heo (cgroup maintainer) as a CC. Should maybe cc to
> cgroup@ as well?

Yeah, that'd be great. Given that it's mostly straight forward extension on
an existing interface, things looks fine from cgroup side; however, please
do add cgroup2 interface and documentation. One thing which has bene
bothersome about the bandwidth interface is that we're exposing
implementation details (window size and now burst size) instead of
usage-centric requirements but that boat has already sailed, so...

Thanks.

-- 
tejun