[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3B2E4B77-3180-4E3A-90FE-6BD08FA47A72@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 15:50:32 +0000
From: "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@...el.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce wrapper functions to
organize xstate buffer access
On Feb 8, 2021, at 04:33, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 07:57:05AM -0800, Chang S. Bae wrote:
>> The struct fpu includes two (possible) xstate buffers -- fpu->state and
>> fpu->state_ptr. Instead of open code for accessing one of them, provide a
>> wrapper that covers both cases.
>
> Right, if you do the thing I suggested - have a single ->xstate pointer
> - then that below is not needed.
Yes. I dropped this patch.
Thanks,
Chang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists