linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tee: optee: add invoke

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210209105838.5fcb31ac@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Tue, 9 Feb 2021 10:58:38 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
Cc:     Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
        op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tee: optee: add invoke_fn tracepoints

On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 19:02:15 +0800
Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com> wrote:

> Add tracepoints to retrieve information about the invoke_fn. This would
> help to measure how many invoke_fn are triggered and how long it takes
> to complete one invoke_fn call.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
> ---
>  drivers/tee/optee/call.c        |  4 ++
>  drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 69 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/call.c b/drivers/tee/optee/call.c
> index 780d7c4fd756..9dbab10e7ac3 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/call.c
> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/call.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
>  #include <linux/tee_drv.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> +#include "optee_trace.h"
>  #include "optee_private.h"
>  #include "optee_smc.h"
>  
> @@ -138,9 +140,11 @@ u32 optee_do_call_with_arg(struct tee_context *ctx, phys_addr_t parg)
>  	while (true) {
>  		struct arm_smccc_res res;
>  
> +		trace_optee_invoke_fn_begin(&param);
>  		optee->invoke_fn(param.a0, param.a1, param.a2, param.a3,
>  				 param.a4, param.a5, param.a6, param.a7,
>  				 &res);
> +		trace_optee_invoke_fn_end(&param, &res);
>  
>  		if (res.a0 == OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_ETHREAD_LIMIT) {
>  			/*
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f209df7004c2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * optee trace points
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2021 Synaptics Incorporated
> + * Author: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
> + */
> +
> +#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
> +#define TRACE_SYSTEM optee
> +
> +#if !defined(_TRACE_OPTEE_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
> +#define _TRACE_OPTEE_H
> +
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> +#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> +#include "optee_private.h"
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(optee_invoke_fn_begin,
> +	TP_PROTO(struct optee_rpc_param *param),
> +	TP_ARGS(param),
> +
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__field(void *, param)
> +		__array(u32, args, 8)
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		__entry->param = param;
> +		memcpy(__entry->args, param, sizeof(__entry->args));

I wonder if you should add a:

		BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(param) < sizeof(__entry->args));

here.

> +	),
> +
> +	TP_printk("param=%p (%x, %x, %x, %x, %x, %x, %x, %x)", __entry->param,
> +		  __entry->args[0], __entry->args[1], __entry->args[2],
> +		  __entry->args[3], __entry->args[4], __entry->args[5],
> +		  __entry->args[6], __entry->args[7])
> +);
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(optee_invoke_fn_end,
> +	TP_PROTO(struct optee_rpc_param *param, struct arm_smccc_res *res),
> +	TP_ARGS(param, res),
> +
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__field(void *, param)
> +		__array(unsigned long, rets, 4)
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		__entry->param = param;
> +		memcpy(__entry->rets, res, sizeof(__entry->rets));

and a:

		BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(res) < sizeof(__entry->rets));

here

Just to make sure that the size of what is being copied, is not smaller
than the amount being copied.

-- Steve

> +	),
> +
> +	TP_printk("param=%p ret (%lx, %lx, %lx, %lx)", __entry->param,
> +		  __entry->rets[0], __entry->rets[1], __entry->rets[2],
> +		  __entry->rets[3])
> +);
> +#endif /* _TRACE_OPTEE_H */
> +
> +#undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
> +#define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH .
> +#undef TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE
> +#define TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE optee_trace
> +
> +/* This part must be outside protection */
> +#include <trace/define_trace.h>