[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c2ca4fc47e61a597261509d16510db6c592d1c80.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 04:40:37 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] checkpatch: Don't check for
mutex_trylock_recursive()
On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 09:52 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> mutex_trylock_recursive() has been removed from the tree, there is no
> need to check for it.
>
> Remove traces of mutex_trylock_recursive()'s existence.
Yay. Assuming patch 1 is applied, thanks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> ---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 1afe3af1cc097..4b2775fd31d9d 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -7062,12 +7062,6 @@ sub process {
> }
> }
>
>
> -# check for mutex_trylock_recursive usage
> - if ($line =~ /mutex_trylock_recursive/) {
> - ERROR("LOCKING",
> - "recursive locking is bad, do not use this ever.\n" . $herecurr);
> - }
> -
> # check for lockdep_set_novalidate_class
> if ($line =~ /^.\s*lockdep_set_novalidate_class\s*\(/ ||
> $line =~ /__lockdep_no_validate__\s*\)/ ) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists