[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210210134945.2699170-1-mperttunen@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 15:49:45 +0200
From: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
To: jassisinghbrar@...il.com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
jonathanh@...dia.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mailbox: tegra-hsp: Set lockdep class dynamically
On Tegra194, due to both BPMP and TCU using mailboxes, we get a
lockdep spew at boot. Both are using different instances of HSP,
so this is harmless. As such give each HSP instance a different
lockdep class.
Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
---
drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c b/drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c
index e07091d71986..acd0675da681 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c
@@ -98,7 +98,9 @@ struct tegra_hsp {
unsigned int num_ss;
unsigned int num_db;
unsigned int num_si;
+
spinlock_t lock;
+ struct lock_class_key lock_key;
struct list_head doorbells;
struct tegra_hsp_mailbox *mailboxes;
@@ -775,6 +777,18 @@ static int tegra_hsp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return err;
}
+ lockdep_register_key(&hsp->lock_key);
+ lockdep_set_class(&hsp->lock, &hsp->lock_key);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int tegra_hsp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct tegra_hsp *hsp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+ lockdep_unregister_key(&hsp->lock_key);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -834,6 +848,7 @@ static struct platform_driver tegra_hsp_driver = {
.pm = &tegra_hsp_pm_ops,
},
.probe = tegra_hsp_probe,
+ .remove = tegra_hsp_remove,
};
static int __init tegra_hsp_init(void)
--
2.30.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists