linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 06/28] locking/rwlocks: Add contention detection for rwlocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d578ea0f-5177-929a-6a5f-4a3e79ab511c@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:57:11 -0500
From:   Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>,
        Peter Feiner <pfeiner@...gle.com>,
        Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@...il.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/28] locking/rwlocks: Add contention detection for
 rwlocks

On 2/10/21 1:04 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 2/9/21 4:27 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> [ ... ]
>
>> It is because in arch/mips/include/asm/spinlock.h, asm/qrwlock.h is included before asm/qspinlock.h. The compilation error should be gone if the asm/qrwlock.h is removed or moved after asm/qspinlock.h.
>>
>> I did a x86 build and there was no compilation issue.
>>
> I can not really comment on what exactly is wrong - I don't know the code well
> enough to do that - but I don't think this is a valid argument.
>
> Anyway, it seems like mips is the only architecture affected by the problem.
> I am not entirely sure, though - linux-next is too broken for that.

It does look like a rather common practice to include both qrwlock.h and 
qspinlock.h in asm/spinlock.h file. I have just a patch to make sure 
that qrwlock is always included after qspinlock.h if present. Hopefully 
that can fix the compilation problem.

Cheers,
Longman