linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 7/7] ACPI: property: Allow counting a single value as an array of 1 element

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:41:56 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 7/7] ACPI: property: Allow counting a single value as
 an array of 1 element

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 04:01:16PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:48 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 02:48:09PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 2:31:48 PM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 1:36:00 PM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:51 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

...

> > > > > > -       if (val && nval == 1) {
> > > > > > +       /* Try to read as a single value first */
> > > > > > +       if (!val || nval == 1) {
> > > > > >                 ret = acpi_data_prop_read_single(data, propname, proptype, val);
> > > > >
> > > > > This returns -EINVAL if val is NULL.
> >
> > Nope. That's why it's a patch 7. Patch 6 solves this.
> 
> That's my point.  Patch 7 should be the first one in the series.

Ah, okay. Since you want this let me rebase.

> > > > > >                 if (ret >= 0)
> > > > > > -                       return ret;
> > > > > > +                       return val ? ret : 1;
> > > > >
> > > > > So val cannot be NULL here.
> >
> > Why not? I have changed conditional.
> >
> > > > > >         }
> >
> > > > > To me, acpi_fwnode_property_read_string_array() needs to special-case
> > > > > val == NULL and nval == 0.
> >
> > nval can be anything in the case of val==NULL. So far neither of your proposals
> > conform this.
> 
> That is if !val and nval != 0 is regarded as a valid combination of
> arguments, but is it?

I believe nobody tested that.

> If that is the case, the check in acpi_data_prop_read() in the last
> patch that I posted needs to be (!val || nval == 1), but that would be
> it, no?

I think it also needs the conditional at return as in my patch.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko