linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] btrfs: Convert kmaps to core page calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210209142755.d85949a7fd1d200bc432d763@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 9 Feb 2021 14:27:55 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Cc:     dsterba@...e.cz, clm@...com, josef@...icpanda.com,
        dsterba@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] btrfs: Convert kmaps to core page calls

On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 14:03:29 -0800 Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 01:58:37PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:52:29 -0800 Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > Let's please queue this up separately.
> > > 
> > > Ok can I retain your Ack on the move part of the patch?
> > 
> > I missed that.
> > 
> > >  Note that it does change kmap_atomic() to kmap_local_page() currently.
> > > 
> > > Would you prefer a separate change for that as well?
> > 
> > Really that should be separated out as well, coming after the move, to
> > make it more easily reverted.  With a standalone changlog for this.
> > 
> > All a bit of a pain, but it's best in the long run.
> 
> Consider it done.
> 
> Ira
> 
> BTW does anyone know the reason this thread is not making it to lore?  I don't
> see any of the emails between Andrew and me?
> 
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210205232304.1670522-1-ira.weiny@intel.com/


https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210209220329.GF2975576@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com
works OK.  It found the message in the linux-fsdevel archive.