[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210210170401.GE3014244@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:04:01 -0800
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, clm@...com,
josef@...icpanda.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/8] mm/highmem: Add VM_BUG_ON() to mem*_page() calls
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 04:41:34PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 08:29:01AM -0800, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:55:02PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 10:22:17PM -0800, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
> > > > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> > > >
> > > > Add VM_BUG_ON bounds checks to ensure the newly lifted and created page
> > > > memory operations do not result in corrupted data in neighbor pages and
> > > > to make them consistent with zero_user().[1][2]
> > >
> > > s/VM_BUG_ON/BUG_ON/g ?
> >
> > Andrew wanted VM_BUG_ON.[1]
>
> I don't care either way, but the patch uses BUG_ON, so the description
> should match.
Oh man... I changed the commit message after spliting the patch and forgot to
change the code... <doh>
Thanks,
Ira
Powered by blists - more mailing lists