[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YCQTQyRlCsJHXzIQ@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:09:23 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Michael Jeanson <mjeanson@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [stable 4.4, 4.9, 4.14, 4.19 LTS] Missing fix "memcg: fix a
crash in wb_workfn when a device disappears"
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:04:19AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While reconciling the lttng-modules writeback instrumentation with its counterpart
> within the upstream Linux kernel, I notice that the following commit introduced in
> 5.6 is present in stable branches 5.4 and 5.5, but is missing from LTS stable branches
> for 4.4, 4.9, 4.14, 4.19:
>
> commit 68f23b89067fdf187763e75a56087550624fdbee
> ("memcg: fix a crash in wb_workfn when a device disappears")
>
> Considering that this fix was CC'd to the stable mailing list, is there any
> reason why it has not been integrated into those LTS branches ?
Yes, it doesn't apply at all. If you think this is needed, I will
gladly take backported and tested patches.
But why do you think this is needed in older kernels? Have you hit
this in real-life?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists