linux-kernel - [tip: x86/mm] x86/fault/32: Move is_f00f_bug() to do_kern_addr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:45:56 -0000
From:   "tip-bot2 for Andy Lutomirski" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/mm] x86/fault/32: Move is_f00f_bug() to do_kern_addr_fault()

The following commit has been merged into the x86/mm branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     f42a40fd53fb5c77bae67d917d66078dbaa46bc2
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/f42a40fd53fb5c77bae67d917d66078dbaa46bc2
Author:        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
AuthorDate:    Tue, 09 Feb 2021 18:33:36 -08:00
Committer:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
CommitterDate: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:11:07 +01:00

x86/fault/32: Move is_f00f_bug() to do_kern_addr_fault()

bad_area() and its relatives are called from many places in fault.c, and
exactly one of them wants the F00F workaround.

__bad_area_nosemaphore() no longer contains any kernel fault code, which
prepares for further cleanups.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/e9668729a48ce6754022b0a4415631e8ebdd00e7.1612924255.git.luto@kernel.org
---
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 91cf7a6..3ffed00 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -482,10 +482,12 @@ static int is_errata100(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address)
 }
 
 /* Pentium F0 0F C7 C8 bug workaround: */
-static int is_f00f_bug(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address)
+static int is_f00f_bug(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
+		       unsigned long address)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_F00F_BUG
-	if (boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_F00F) && idt_is_f00f_address(address)) {
+	if (boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_F00F) && !(error_code & X86_PF_USER) &&
+	    idt_is_f00f_address(address)) {
 		handle_invalid_op(regs);
 		return 1;
 	}
@@ -853,9 +855,6 @@ __bad_area_nosemaphore(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 		return;
 	}
 
-	if (is_f00f_bug(regs, address))
-		return;
-
 	no_context(regs, error_code, address, SIGSEGV, si_code);
 }
 
@@ -1195,6 +1194,9 @@ do_kern_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long hw_error_code,
 	}
 #endif
 
+	if (is_f00f_bug(regs, hw_error_code, address))
+		return;
+
 	/* Was the fault spurious, caused by lazy TLB invalidation? */
 	if (spurious_kernel_fault(hw_error_code, address))
 		return;