[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ccc9edc3-1200-356e-7bb3-863c3d284490@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 23:52:35 +0530
From: Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: Add SC7280 GCC clock binding
Thanks Stephen for your review comments.
On 1/13/2021 1:36 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> + clock-names:
>> + items:
>> + - const: bi_tcxo
>> + - const: bi_tcxo_ao
>> + - const: sleep_clk
>> + - const: pcie_0_pipe_clk
>> + - const: pcie_1_pipe_clk
>> + - const: usb3_phy_wrapper_gcc_usb30_pipe_clk
>
> Don't ufs phy clks also go into gcc?
>
The latest patch has this updated.
>> +
>> + '#clock-cells':
>> + const: 1
>> +
>> + '#reset-cells':
>> + const: 1
>> +
>> + '#power-domain-cells':
>> + const: 1
>> +
>> + reg:
>> + maxItems: 1
>> +
>> + protected-clocks:
>> + description:
>> + Protected clock specifier list as per common clock binding.
>
> I suppose this is fine.
>
Removed the above in the latest patch.
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists