[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210210190918.GA2208287@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 19:09:18 +0000
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] kprobes: Remove kprobe::fault_handler
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 02:57:03PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Somewhat related.. I had this pending.
>
> ---
> Subject: kprobes: Remove kprobe::fault_handler
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Date: Tue Feb 2 10:43:41 CET 2021
>
> The reason for kprobe::fault_handler(), as given by their comment:
>
> * We come here because instructions in the pre/post
> * handler caused the page_fault, this could happen
> * if handler tries to access user space by
> * copy_from_user(), get_user() etc. Let the
> * user-specified handler try to fix it first.
>
> If just plain bad. Those other handlers are ran from non-preemptible
> context and had better use _nofault() functions. Also, there is no
> upstream usage of this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists