[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202102101213.D603669D4@keescook>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:17:23 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
ccross@...roid.com, anton@...msg.org,
Huang Yiwei <hyiwei@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pstore/ram : Add support for cached pages
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 08:22:21PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> There could be a sceanario where we define some region
> in normal memory and use them store to logs which is later
> retrieved by bootloader during warm reset.
>
> In this scenario, we wanted to treat this memory as normal
> cacheable memory instead of default behaviour which
> is an overhead. Making it cacheable could improve
> performance.
Cool; yeah. I like this idea.
>
> This commit gives control to change mem_type from Device
> tree, and also documents the value for normal memory.
What's the safest default setting?
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Yiwei <hyiwei@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/ramoops.rst | 4 +++-
> fs/pstore/ram.c | 1 +
> fs/pstore/ram_core.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/ramoops.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/ramoops.rst
> index b0a1ae7..8f107d8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/ramoops.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/ramoops.rst
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Ramoops oops/panic logger
>
> Sergiu Iordache <sergiu@...omium.org>
>
> -Updated: 17 November 2011
> +Updated: 10 Feb 2021
>
> Introduction
> ------------
> @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ mapping to pgprot_writecombine. Setting ``mem_type=1`` attempts to use
> depends on atomic operations. At least on ARM, pgprot_noncached causes the
> memory to be mapped strongly ordered, and atomic operations on strongly ordered
> memory are implementation defined, and won't work on many ARMs such as omaps.
> +Setting ``mem_type=2`` attempts to treat the memory region as normal memory,
> +which enables full cache on it. This can improve the performance.
>
> The memory area is divided into ``record_size`` chunks (also rounded down to
> power of two) and each kmesg dump writes a ``record_size`` chunk of
> diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram.c b/fs/pstore/ram.c
> index ca6d8a8..b262c57 100644
> --- a/fs/pstore/ram.c
> +++ b/fs/pstore/ram.c
> @@ -666,6 +666,7 @@ static int ramoops_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
> field = value; \
> }
>
> + parse_u32("mem-type", pdata->record_size, pdata->mem_type);
This was handled by "unbuffered" above. Can you find a way to resolve
potential conflicts between these?
> parse_u32("record-size", pdata->record_size, 0);
> parse_u32("console-size", pdata->console_size, 0);
> parse_u32("ftrace-size", pdata->ftrace_size, 0);
> diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
> index aa8e0b6..83cd612 100644
> --- a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
> +++ b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
> @@ -396,6 +396,10 @@ void persistent_ram_zap(struct persistent_ram_zone *prz)
> persistent_ram_update_header_ecc(prz);
> }
>
> +#define MEM_TYPE_WCOMBINE 0
> +#define MEM_TYPE_NONCACHED 1
> +#define MEM_TYPE_NORMAL 2
It might be nice for this to have a human-readable name too, but let's
start with numeric. :)
Please update the mem_type MODULE_PARM_DESC to detail the new values too.
> +
> static void *persistent_ram_vmap(phys_addr_t start, size_t size,
> unsigned int memtype)
> {
> @@ -409,9 +413,11 @@ static void *persistent_ram_vmap(phys_addr_t start, size_t size,
> page_start = start - offset_in_page(start);
> page_count = DIV_ROUND_UP(size + offset_in_page(start), PAGE_SIZE);
>
> - if (memtype)
> + if (memtype == MEM_TYPE_NORMAL)
> + prot = PAGE_KERNEL;
> + else if (memtype == MEM_TYPE_NONCACHED)
> prot = pgprot_noncached(PAGE_KERNEL);
> - else
> + else if (memtype == MEM_TYPE_WCOMBINE)
> prot = pgprot_writecombine(PAGE_KERNEL);
Let's make this a switch statement.
>
> pages = kmalloc_array(page_count, sizeof(struct page *), GFP_KERNEL);
> --
> Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
> Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists