[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e252b372-c726-68aa-2c35-c64e290e9730@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:42:04 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, dwmw@...zon.co.uk,
maz@...nel.org, peterx@...hat.com, luto@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: x86: kernel: apic: Fix spelling theroretical to
theoretical in the file vector.c
On 2/9/21 5:55 AM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>
> s/theroretical/theoretical/
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> index 3c9c7492252f..aa9d3cf69580 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> @@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@ void irq_force_complete_move(struct irq_desc *desc)
> * of the interrupt on the apic/system bus would be delayed
> * beyond the point where the target cpu disables interrupts
> * in stop machine. I doubt that it can happen, but at least
> - * there is a theroretical chance. Virtualization might be
> + * there is a theoretical chance. Virtualization might be
> * able to expose this, but AFAICT the IOAPIC emulation is not
> * as stupid as the real hardware.
> *
> --
> 2.30.0
>
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists