[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <93745280-dbe9-491c-a79d-c9c364b83880@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 14:52:56 -0800
From: nnet <nnet@...tmail.fm>
To: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
Cc: a.heider@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch, gerald@....net,
gregory.clement@...tlin.com, kabel@...nel.org, kostap@...vell.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luka.perkov@...tura.hr,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, mturquette@...libre.com,
rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk, sboyd@...nel.org, tmn505@...il.com,
vladimir.vid@...tura.hr
Subject: Re: [PATCH mvebu v2 00/10] Armada 37xx: Fix cpufreq changing base CPU speed to 800 MHz from 1000 MHz
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 2:42 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 February 2021 13:45:08 nnet wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 1:33 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 09 February 2021 13:00:26 nnet wrote:
> > > > > If you have other Armada 3720 boards (Espressobin v5/v7, uDPU, Devel Board, ...) then it will be nice to do an additional tests and check if instability issues are finally fixed.
> > > >
> > > > These patches applied to the 5.4.96 in OpenWrt (98d61b5) work fine so far on an Espressobin v7 AFAICT per changing values in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0.
> > > >
> > > > Are these changes intended to work @1.2 GHz on the v7?
> > >
> > > Hello! Do you have 1.2 GHz A3720 SoC?
> >
> > Maybe (not)? ESPRESSObin_V7_1-0 on the underside.
>
> Look at the package of SoC chip. On top of the package is printed
> identifier 88F3720. On the last line should be one of the string:
> C080, C100, C120, I080, I100 which identifies frequency
> (080 = 800 MHz, 100 = 1 GHz, 120 = 1.2 GHz)
>
> Can you check what is printed on A3720 SoC package?
Both of mine are 88F3720-A0-C120.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists