[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <82fec498-b1c0-7acd-cf1e-8bb40a4e688e@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:34:57 -0800
From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>,
"AKASHI, Takahiro" <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
vincenzo.frascino@....com, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>, tao.li@...o.com,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@...ux.microsoft.com>,
balajib@...ux.microsoft.com, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 00/10] Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec on
ARM64
On 2/10/21 1:39 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 15:55 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>> On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 14:42 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:33 AM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
>>
>>> Ideally, we don't apply the same patch in 2 branches. It looks like
>>> there's a conflict but no real dependence on the above patch (the
>>> ima_buffer part). The conflict seems trivial enough that Linus can
>>> resolve it in the merge window.
>>>
>>> Or Mimi can take the whole thing if preferred?
>>
>> How about I create a topic branch with just the two patches, allowing
>> both of us to merge it? There shouldn't be a problem with re-writing
>> next-integrity history.
>
> The 2 patches are now in the ima-kexec-fixes branch.
>
Thanks a lot Mimi.
Rob - I will address the 2 comments you'd provided today, and build the
patches in ima-kexec-fixes branch.
If you have more comments in the v17 patches, please let me know.
thanks,
-lakshmi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists