[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YCM9c9L/B8iS4IKi@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 02:57:07 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/9] net: phy: icplus: use PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT()
for IP101A/G
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 05:40:44PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> According to the datasheet of the IP101A/G there is no revision field
> and MII_PHYSID2 always reads as 0x0c54. Use PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT() then.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Lets hope the datasheet is correct and up to date, because this could
cause a regression if wrong.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists